National ethnology / anthropology - Literature and Society

Pre-requisites: There are no prerequisites for attendance.

Course objectives: The main goal of course is to articulate an anthropological and interdisciplinary field of study from the standpoint of ethnographic and literary discourse as cultural practices in certain social and historical contexts.

Course description: The field of literature, its elements and rules The types of studies and interpretations; views on literature and approaches The relations between anthropology and literary studies Anthropological-ethnographic writing and interpretative approaches The use of literature in the local ethnology; contribution to literary history and other literary events Contextual interpretation of the genre of domestic and world literature

Learning Outcomes: Students should master the conceptual language of the relevant theoretical and methodological approaches and apply it to their research while processing specific topics.

Literature/Reading:

• Burdije, P., Pravila umetnosti: Geneza i struktura polja književnosti, Svetovi, Novi Sad 2003, 254-354.
• Bahtin, M., O romanu, Beograd, Nolit, 1989.
• Božić, J., Antropologija knjige i čitanja, pdf
• The John Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory and Criticism, Edited by Marc Manganaro and Martin Kreiswirht, Internet dokument.
• Ajdačić, D., Ritualistički pristup književnim tekstovima. Internet dokument.
• Gellner, E., Anthropology and Politics: Revolutions in Sacred Grove, Oxford and Cambridge, Blackwell, 1995. (7. James Frazer and Cambridge Anthropology), 102-117.
• Frojd, S., Sumanutost i snovi u „Gradivi“ V. Jensena; Dostojevski i oceubistvo, u: S. Frojd, Iz kulture i umetnosti, Novi Sad, Matica srpska, 1969, 5-98, 235-259.
• Ženet, Ž., Figure V, Novi Sad, Svetovi 2002.
• Archetypal Theory And Criticism, by Carol Schreier Rupprecht. Internet document.
• Bart, R., Književnost, Mitologija, Semiologija, Nolit, Beograd 1979.
• Bart, R., Furije, Sad, Lojola, Vuk Karadžić, Beograd 1979.
• Kalve, L. Ž., Rolan Bart: Jedno političko gledanje na znak, Beograd, BIGZ, 1976.
• Goldman, L., Struktura: ljudska stvarnost i metodološki koncept, u: Strukturalistička kontroverza. Jezici kritike i nauke o čoveku, Priredili E. Donato i R. Meksi, Beograd, Prosveta, 19
• Sontag, S., The Anthropologist as Hero, u: E. Nelson Hayes and Tanya Hayes, (Eds.), Claude Lévi-Strauss: The Anthropologist as Hero, 184-196.
• Milošević, N., Antropološki eseji, Beograd, Nolit, 1978, Drugo, ispravljeno i dopunjeno izdanje, 241-307, 311-317.
• Fabijeti, U., R. Maligeti, V. Matera, Uvod u antropologiju: Od lokalnog do globalnog, Clio, Beograd 2002. (6. gl., 162-180)
• Šuvaković, M., Diskurzivna analiza, Univerzitet umetnosti u Beogradu, Beograd 2006.
• Marcus, G. E., M. J. Fischer, Antropologija kao kritika kulture: Eksperimentalni trenutak u humanističkim znanostima, Naklada Breza, Zagreb 2003.
• Thornton, R. J. , “Imagine Yourself Set Down”, Anthropology Today, 1 (oct. 1985): 7-14.
• Clifford, J., “On Ethnographic Self-Fashioning. Conrad and Malinowski”, u: The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1
• Clifford, J., Introduction: Partial Truts, u: Clifford i Marcus, eds.,Writing Culture, 1986, 1-26.
• Pratt, M. L., Fieldwork in Common Places, u: Clifford, Marcus 1986, 27-50.
• Rabinow, P., Representations are Social Facts: Modernity and Post-Modernity in Anthropology, u: Clifford and Marcus, eds., 1986, 234-261.
• Crapanzano, V., Hermes’ Dilemma: The Masking of Subversion in Ethnographic Description, u: Clifford and Marcus, eds., 1986, 51-76.
• Clifford, J., The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1988.
• Clifford, J., Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century, Harvard University Press, 1997.
• Geertz, C., Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1988.
• Gerc, K., Duboka igra: beleške o balinežanskoj borbi petlova, u: Gerc, Tumačenje kultura, 2, 221-281.
• Geertz, C., Blurred Genres: The Refiguration of Social Thought, u: Geertz, Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology, Basic Books, 1983, 19-34.
• Geertz, C., Found in Translation: On the Social History of the Moral Imagination, u: Local Knowledge, 35-54.
• Dorst, J. D., The Written Suburb. An American Site, An Ethnographic Dilemma, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989, 101-136, 204-210.
• Archetti, E. P., ed., Exploring the Written: Anthropology and the Multiplicity of Writing. Scandinavian University Press, 1994.
• Eriksen, T. H, The author as anthropologist. Some West Indian lessons about the relevance of fiction for anthropology, u: E. Archeti, Exploring the Written. Anthropology and the Multiplicity of Writin
• Rapport, N., Transcendent Individual: Towards a Literary and Liberal Anthropology, London and New York, 1997.
• De Angelis, R., Between Anthropology and Literature: Interdisciplinary Discourse, London, Routledge, 2002.
• Sekulić, N., Poetika i antropologija. Uloga poetike u pomeranju granica antropologije. Tekst na intenetu. www.sac.org.yu/komunikacija/casopisi/fid/XXIV/d04/html_ser_lat
• Simić, M., „Da li su antropolozi (još uvek) književnici? (kratak pregled antropoloških pristupa problemu književnosti i antropologije)“, Zbornik Matice srpske za književnost i jezik, Novi Sad, LIII/1-3 (
• Lionnet, F., A Politics of the „we“. Autobiography, Race, and Nation. pdf
• Murphy, R. F., The Body Silent: The different world of the disabled. New York, London, 1990.
• Barnard, A., Tarzan and the lost races: Parallels between anthropology and early science fiction, u: Archeti, ed., 1994, 231-257.
• Žikić, B., „Strah i ludilo: prolegomena za antropološko proučavanje žanrovske književnosti“, Etnoantropološki problemi, n.s., g. 1, sv. 2, 2006, 27-43.
• Đorđević, I., „Upotreba tradicijskih motiva u fantastičnoj književnosti“, Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU LIV, Beograd 2006, 101-111.
• Todorov, C., Mi i drugi: Francuska misao o ljudskoj raznolikosti, Biblioteka XX vek, Beograd 1994.
• Monteskje, Š., Persijska pisma, Utopija, Beograd, 2004.
• Golsvorti, V.. Izmišljanje Ruritanije: Imperijalizam mašte, Geopoetika, Beograd 2000.
• Noris, D., Balkanski mit, pitanja identiteta i modernosti, Geopoetika, Beograd 2002.
• Bel, D. i Dž. Bini, Teatar surovosti, reke požude. Erotičnost ulice, u: Prizori ulice: Planiranje, identitet i kontrola u javnom prostoru (priredio Nikolas Fajf), Beograd, Clio 2002, 18
• Said, E., Orijentalizam, Beograd, XX vek, 2000.
• Said, E. W., Reflexions on Exile and Other Essays, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusets 2002. (Conrad and Nietzche, History, Literature and Geography...)
• Bogoeva Sedlar, Lj., „Mapping the Other, Mapping the Self: B. Wongar’s Novel Raki“, Facta Universitatis, series Linguistic and Literature, Vol. 2, No 9, 2002: 313-325.
• Caiter, T., „Censored Creativity: B. Wongar’s Original Version of Walg“, Journal of Australian Studies 77, 2003.
• Bhattacharji, S., „Sex and empire building in the fiction of Chinua Achebe“, Studies in Media & Information Literacy Education, 4 (2004). Internet dokument.
• Milutinović, Z., Susret na trećem mestu, Beograd, Geopoetika, 2006, 22-82.
• Milutinović, Z., „Misunderstanding is a rule, understanding is a miracle: Ivo Andrić’s Bosnian Chronicle“, Slavonic and East European Review, July 2008.
• Bosna između Istoka i Zapada (od kosovskog mita u ideologiji Mlade Bosne do romana Iva Andrića Travnička hronika), Sveske Andrićeve zadužbine, 6: 257-287.
• O balkanskom modelu sveta, Sveske Andrićeve Zadužbine, 14: 165-220.
• Aleksov, B., Poturica gori od Turčina: srpski istoričari o verskim preobraćenjima. Internet dokument. http//www.iis.unsa.ba/posebna/mitovi/mitovi_aleksov.htm
• Zamišljanje Jugoslavije: istorijska arheologija Ive Andrića, Andrićeva Zadužbina, Sveske 13: 105-123.
• Abu-Lughod, L., The Interpretation of Culture(s) after Television, u: Ortner, S. B., ed., The Fate of „Culture“: Geertz and Beyond , University of California Press, 1999, 110-135.
• Dojčinović, B., O ženama i književnosti početkom veka. Internet tekst.
• Prelić, M., „Analiza ženske štampe u periodu između dva rata u Beogradu“, GEI SANU XXXVIII, Beograd 1989, 105-125.
• Kovačević, I., Istorija srpske etnologije, I, Prosvetiteljstvo, Beograd 2001, 219-224 (Veličanje prirode i „robinzonijade“ u srpskoj književnosti krajem XVIII i početkom XIX veka); 225-242 („Plemeniti di
• Đorđević, T., Hajduk Stanko, u: Naš narodni život 2, 109-117.
• Đorđević, T., Književne prilike u Srbiji pre stotinu godina, u: Naš narodni život, 3, 175-205.
• Đorđević, T., Jedno pismo Vuka S. Karadžića crnogorskom vladici Petru I Petroviću, u: Naš narodni život, 3, 262-266.
• Đorđević, T., Ljubomir P. Nenadović u Italiji, u: Naš narodni život, 3, 303-311.
• Zlatanović, S., Svadba – priča o identitetu, Vranje i okolina, Posebna izdanja Etnografskog instituta SANU, knj. 47, Beograd 2003, 144-150.
• Vukmanović, J., Etnološka građa u Gorskom vijencu, Stogodišnjica Gorskog vijenca 1847-1947, Beograd 1947, 48-53.
• Burdije, P., Pravila umetnosti: Geneza i struktura polja književnosti, Svetovi, Novi Sad 2003, 303-320.
• Kompanjon, A., Demon teorije, Svetovi, Novi Sad 2001, 5-340.
• Eli Rozik, The Ritual Origin of Theatre: A Scientific Theory or Theatrical Ideology?, The Journal of Religion and Theatre, vol. 2, no. 1, Fall 2003. Internet dokument.
• Mark Turner, The Literary Mind, New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996, Bedtime with Shahrazad, 3-11, Human Meaning, 12-25.
• Mark Turner, Deep Play, u: Cognitive Dimensions of Social Science: The Way We Think About Politics, Economics, Law, and Society, Oxford University Press, 2001, 3-59.
• Sarah Harasym, ed., Gayatri Chacravorty Spivak, The Postcolonial Critic: Interviews, Strategies, Dialogues, Routledge, New York and London, 1999.
• Eagleton, T., F. Jameson, E. Said, Nationalism, Colonialism, and Literature, Minneapolis, London: University of Minessota Press, 2001.
• Barth, R., The Death of the Author, pdf
• Noris, D., Balkanski mit, pitanja identiteta i modernosti, Geopoetika, Beograd 2002,151-181.
• Roberto Fransozi, „Narrative Analysis Or Why (And How) Sociologist Should be Interested in Narrative“, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 24 (1998): 517-54.
• Nasleđe Pjera Burdijea: pouke i nadahnuća. Priredili Miloš Nemanjić i Ivana Spasić, Filip Višnjić, Beograd 2006, 65-75, 77-90.
• Paul Fajerabend, Nauka kao umetnost, Izdavačko preduzeće Matice srpske, Novi Sad 1994.
• Roman Jakobson, Lingvistika i poetika, Nolit, Beograd 1966.
• Smadar Lavi, Kirin Narayan, i Renato Rosaldo, eds., Creativity/Anthropology, Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press, 1993.
• Gayatri Spivak, In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics, Methuen: New York and London, 1987.
• Spivak, Reading the World: Literary Studies in the Eighties, u: Spivak, In Other Worlds, 95-101.
• A. Mangel, Istorija čitanja, Novi Sad, Svetovi, 2005.
• J. Clifford, G. Marcus, eds., Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1986.
• M. Šamić, Istorijski izvori travničke hronike Ive Andrića i njihova umjetnička transpozicija. Sarajevo, Veselin Masleša, 1962.
• Š. Monteskje, Persijska pisma
• K. Vajt, Pisma iz Srbije i Crne Gore, Beograd, Geopetika, 1997.
• Triling, Lajonel, Iskrenost i autentičnost, Nolit, Beograd 1990.
• J. Clifford, 1. On Ethnographic Authority, u: The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1988, 21-54.
• J. Clifford, Power and Dialogue in Ethnography: Marcel Griaule’s Initiation, u: The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Pre
• J. Clifford, On Ethnographic Surrealism, u: The Predicament, 117-151; Tell about Your Trip: Michel Leiris, 165-174.
• J. Clifford, 5. A Poetics of Displacement: Victor Segalen, u: The Predicament, 152-163.
• Clifford, On Orientalism, u: The Predicament, 255-276.
• S. Nedeljković, Čast, krv i suze: ogledi iz antropologije etniciteta i nacionalizma, Beograd 2007, 119-165.
• Zuppa Jelena, „Novo žensko pismo: da bi se kazalo život“, u: Žena, znak, jezik, Delo, god. XXVII, br. 4, Beograd 1981, 15-28.
• Endru Baruh Vahtel, Književnost Istočne Evrope u doba postkomunizma: Uloga pisca u Istočnoj Evropi, Stubovi kulture, Beograd 2001: Dobrica Ćosić: srpski kralj Lir, 106-111.
• Milanović, Đurđa, „Jezik ženske štampe“, u: Žena, znak, jezik, Delo, god. XXVII, br. 4, Beograd 1981, 66-82.
• Iveković, Rada, „Indija je nijema žena“, u: Delo, 1981/4, 88-105.
• Milošević, N., Gnoseološka funkcija književnosti, u: Ideologija, psihologija, stvaralaštvo, Duga, Beograd 1972, 41-125.
• Gerc, Kliford. 2010. Antropolog kao pisac. Beograd: XX vek, 168 str.
• Bužinjska, Ana i Mihal Pavel Markovski. 2009. Književne teorije XX veka, Beograd: Službeni glasnik, 15-44, 51-74, 89-112, 123-137, 147-159, 189-205, 215-243,